AI in public deliverables is now a partial-refund line.

Tokto gives the public-sector CFO one record that ties every AI tool, every prompt, every model output, and every vendor data flow to a procurement, a use case, and a constituent or student, ready for the auditor general, FOIA, and federal monitor obligations.

What you get with Tokto

• Every AI tool tied to a procurement, a vendor, a use case, a constituent or student, and a decision rule.
• A complete record for the auditor general, FOIA, the procurement officer, the federal monitor, and the IG.
• Policy applied at the prompt: no AI use in a public deliverable without verification, no proctoring or detection tool without bias testing.
• Defensibility under Title VI complaint, public-records request, federal procurement audit, and IG review at once.

How it works

Tokto sits across every AI deployment a public institution ships, with a CFO view that ties each AI tool to a procurement, a vendor, and a use case. Constituent-facing chatbots, AI detection tools, and pricing platforms all become records the CFO and the procurement officer can reconcile.

When the DOJ files a seven-year consent judgment on an AI pricing platform, when a Title VI complaint reaches federal court, when a partial-refund demand follows AI-fabricated citations, the CFO works one trail across all three.

What goes wrong without it

• An AI proctoring tool produces a false positive. A Title VI complaint reaches federal court. The procurement record is incomplete.
• An AI vendor uses non-public competitor data to drive a public-dollar decision. DOJ consent decree, court-appointed monitor for years.
• A constituent-facing chatbot ships a fabricated citation in a public deliverable. Partial refund and corrected report follow.
• An AI deployment is in public use without bias testing on file. State AI procurement law and the IG both open.