AI in a client deliverable is now an indemnification clause in litigation.

Tokto gives the firm's General Counsel one record that ties every AI-assisted deliverable, every consultant prompt, every model output, and every client data flow to an engagement and a partner, ready for client indemnification, professional-liability defense, and regulator inquiry.

What you get with Tokto

• Every model output tied to an engagement, a partner, a client, a deliverable, and a model version.
• A complete record for the client GC, the client regulator, the indemnifying carrier, and the firm's general counsel.
• Policy applied at the prompt: no AI text in a client deliverable without verification, no client data to a model without contract.
• Defensibility under client indemnification, professional-liability claim, regulator inquiry, and reputational review at once.

How it works

Tokto sits across every consultant co-pilot, every internal LLM tool, and every AI-assisted research workflow the firm ships into a client engagement. Each prompt is a record tied to the engagement, the partner, the client, and the verification step. Citations and source documents are stamped at the moment of generation.

When a government client demands a refund on AI-fabricated content, when an enterprise client invokes an AI-indemnification clause, when a regulator opens an inquiry on a public-sector deliverable, the General Counsel works one defense theory across all three.

What goes wrong without it

• An AI-assisted compliance report ships with fabricated citations to a government client. Refund demand, press cycle, sector wake-up call.
• An enterprise client invokes its AI-indemnification clause. The firm cannot produce the per-prompt record the clause requires.
• Client data flows into a model without a current data-processing agreement. A regulated client opens a privacy inquiry.
• Two practice areas ship AI co-pilots with inconsistent disclosure standards. The same partner is exposed under both client agreements.