Your AI history is now discoverable, and the bar is asking.

Tokto records every prompt, every model output, every privileged document touched by an AI tool, and every vendor co-pilot embedded in your firm, ready for the court, the state bar, the client, and the malpractice carrier.

What you get with Tokto

• Every prompt and output tied to a matter, a privilege designation, an attorney, and the ethical wall in force.
• A single record for the trial court, the state bar, the client GC, opposing counsel, and the carrier on the same evidence.
• Policy applied at the model: work product redacted, client identifiers blocked, ethical walls enforced before content reaches the prompt.
• Defensibility under Rule 11, state bar discipline, malpractice, and client engagement letters at once.

How it works

Tokto governs the AI surface of the firm. Research co-pilots, drafting assistants, contract-review SaaS, deposition-prep tools — all become records at the moment they fire. The record carries the matter, the attorney, the client, the model version, the privilege designation, and the ethical wall that applied. The GC controls one trail, not four vendor dashboards.

When the bar opens its 200th hallucination matter on a firm, when a client demands the AI history behind an engagement deliverable, when a malpractice claim turns on whether a junior verified a model output, the record is the same record. The GC answers in days, not depositions.

What goes wrong without it

• The bar asks how the firm enforces Model Rule 1.6 on AI tools. The answer is a memo, not a record.
• Opposing counsel finds a hallucinated citation in a brief. The firm cannot prove the lawyer verified the output. The sanction sticks.
• A vendor co-pilot retains client data past the engagement letter's destruction window. The client GC reads the news and pulls the relationship.
• The malpractice carrier asks for a sample AI history at renewal. The firm hands over screenshots. Premium spikes 40%.